Leadership Style and Approach Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Leadership Style and Approach - Essay ExampleHer flake of lead tendency is democratic. According to scholars and scientists, democratic loss leaders have certain attributes that include the senior workers in decision-making processes. Democracy facilitates creativity and brainstorming which provides ideas to the whole management process. This type of leaders enhances productivity and satisfaction of two the junior members of management and customers at large. Increase in productivity increase the rate of profit maximization in an organization. Evelyn in her discipline included her employees in decision-making processes. She also emphasized on workers using their recommended fourth dimension with customers on the phones lines to satisfy only questions that a customer would have on their products. This type of leadership demeanor toilette be explained in detail by leadership theories. There are the situational theories that explain that a leader should choose the type of le adership style that suits his/her situation. In most cases, the democratic style of leadership has been proved to obtain the best results. Team members also feel free to express their feelings in case of any new situations. For example in Evelyns case, she could spend time with her team members while perform their chores. In case of any problems such as fatigue or rude customers, she would support the members by team members by telling them that she was at the same situation some time but by and by made it in life. The functional theory explains that a leader should have contingency plans, which are employ by the leaders in certain situations (Igbal 2011). Erik Rasmussen Erik Rasmussen on the other hand, has a different type of leadership style. His style consists of two styles namely people-oriented leadership and autocratic type of leadership (Daenzer 2009). He is young, bright and canty and a no nonsense person when it comes to his areas of supervision. The people-oriented st yle deals with leaders who are focused in their positions at work and providing the irrespective results. However, they may do this to the extent of some team members where decisions made by the leader are final. Erik in this case is a graduate and is expected to deliver the expected results. He does not consider the other team members in making decisions. From the case, it is clear that at some point, he deals with court cutting strategies without considering ideas from the workers. Alternatively, this leadership style without being monitored may be taken too far by leaders who are so much focused on results rather than the welfare of workers and customers. With the autocratic style of leadership, the leaders possess most power and their decisions could be final. In Eriks case, he seems to have all the powers and his orders are final. He does not care what the previous leaders had put in place to dish up boost production and profits. However, this style has some advantages such a s fast and effective decision-making processes where leaders can make final decisions. On the other hand, team members do not want this type of leadership since their ideas are not included in the decision-making process (Peggy 2006). Evaluation / Judgment Evelyn Gustafson used the